web analytics

Custody Of A Child When One Parent Dies

Parents charged after baby ingests drugs dies

NBC WBAL11 AND ULTIMATELY, THEIR DAUGHTER DIED. NBC WBAL11 BACK ON AUGUST 13 POLICE SAYNBC WBAL11 ALVIN THOMPSON AND SINEAD MCNAIR BROUGHT THNBEIC R 2 YEWBARAL O11LD DAUGHTER KORRI THOMPSON TO THENBC WB AL.

11 ER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL CENTER. SHE WAS NOT NBBRC EA THINWBG.AL 11 ACCORDING TO COURT DOCUMENTS,NBC WBAL11 NBC WBAL11 INITIALLY, THE PARENTS SAIDNBC WB.

AL11 KORRI DRANK SOMETHING FROM A CONTAINER OUTSIDE OF THEIR HOME BUT WHEN TOXICNBOLC OG Y REWBPOALRT11S CAME BACK TESTING POSITIVE FOR METHADONE, THEY CHANGED THEIR NB C.

WBSTALOR11Y. gt;gt;NBC WBAL11 TNBHRC OU GHOUWBT ALTH11E COURSE OF THE INVESTIGATION, THEY LEARNED THAT ATNB SC OM E POWBINALT 11TH E BABY HAD INGESTED METHADONE. WHICH BASICALLNBY C CA USEDWBAL11 THE CHILD’S BODYNB TC O SHUTWB DALOW11N. gt;gt; CHARGING NBDOC CU MENTWBS ALGO11 O N TO.

SAY THAT PARENTS TOLD POLICE NBC WBALTH11AT AT AROUND NOON ON THE 13TH,NB C WBAL11KO RRI WENT TO THE BATHROOM IN THEIR HOME IN THE UNIT BLOCK OF SOUTH EXETER STREET AND FOUND NBAC WBAL11 DRINKING BOTTLE CONTAINING A.

METHADONE MIX THAT BELONGED TO THOMNBPSC ON ANDWB DALRA11NK IT. DESPITE THE FACT THAT THENBC WBAL11 PARENTS SAID THEY NOTICED THE CHILD NBWAC S UNCOWBMMALON11LY SCRATCHING AND SHALLOW BREATHING, THEYNBC WBAL11 DIDN’T TAKE HER TO THE HOSPITAL FOR 15 HNBOUC RS . WBAL11.

SHE WOULD BE IN A COMA AS HERNBC WBAL11 HEALTH DETERIORATED UNTIL AUGUST 24THNB WC HE N SHWBE ALPA11SS ED AWAY. NBC WB AL 11 gt;gt; AFTER INTERVIEWING THNBEC.

Babys Genitals Removed Under State Custody Adoptive Parents Sue

The Southern Poverty Law Center has filed a lawsuit against the South Carolina Department of Social Services over the case involving a child that was born with an intersex condition now this child who is identified as MC was born with both male and female reproductive organs however while the child was under the custody of the state they made the decision for him to but remove his testicles and penis in order to make him a girl however now that the child is.

Eightyearsold he identifies as a male and the adoptive parents and the Southern Poverty Law Center would like to sue the state after making that decision for him they believe that is constitutional rights were violated I should know that and since the nineteen fifties many states in the US did pass laws that allow healthcare providers to make that decision for the babies I’m and it’s problematic it’s definitely problematic because there’s no way to.

Determine how that child will identify once he or she grows up remember sex and gender are two completely different things you might be born with one sex but you might have a completely different gender identity can I feel so bad for that kid and so I don’t think that the status South Carolina was necessarily acting maliciously.

I bet the that if you ask those people they it was a heartwrenching decision for them and they didn’t know how to go about it apparently it’s easier to do the surgery where your move the male genitalia oppose the female genitalia I and I would be shocked if they weren’t doing it out over desire to help the kid I think I think you’re right about that usually the intentions are good.

They just don’t want the child to have a complicated life later on I’m but you just don’t know how that child will identify later so making that decision for him or her is is a disastrous way to go about it because look now this child identifies as a boy and he lost his male reproductive organs no is yeah there’s no question about done and as a reading a story about Harry you like well obviously can’t get that back even.

Though he’s avoiding ride he his gender is avoid house oh you feel so terrible about I feel sick to my stomach think it all my god what did you do that poor kid you know I’ll but I felt conflicted about the lawsuit so I feel like I’m not sure they’d allow to malice but at the same time you know %um in some other guys made a good pointer in a production meeting that.

They you know look this is how we get to the right place right to set precedent and if this case at I mean first of all other defendants in this case wanted the lawsuit to be dropped however the a federal judge ruled know we will go forward because there could have been a violation a constitutional violation here I’m so that the case will go forward and I think it’s important for to go forward because this does if it does I if the Southern Poverty Law Center in the adoptive.

Leave a Reply